(By Yomi Kazeem) - The Nollywood Movie Experiment to Research
Nigerians’ Anti-corruption Behavior
The popularity of Nigeria’s
Nollywood movie industry—the world’s second largest by volume—was covertly
deployed for a social cause five years ago.
Researchers from Princeton
University, the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) collaborated to commission a
feature film to test local habits on reporting corruption. The research for the
movie, which was funded by the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research and an
anonymous donor, was approved by the Princeton Institutional Review Board.
Given the popularity of
the local movie industry and the prevalence
of corruption in Nigeria, the researchers looked to study how
Nigerians report corruption using the high-profile actors to model behavior.
Nigeria’s corruption problems are
well-documented with a landmark survey two years capturing the scale of
corruption especially among
public officers. Despite his well-publicized anti-corruption stance
and message in office, Nigeria’s president Buhari has struggled to definitely
address the problem with his administration suffering
corruption-related scandals of its own.
As a first step, the researchers
commissioned iROKOtv, a local streaming service and content producer focused
exclusively on Nollywood, to produce Water of Gold, starring popular Nollywood actors Yemi Blaq,
Clem Ohameze and Mike Ezuruonye.
The movie plot focused on corrupt
government officials in the oil-rich Niger-Delta and depicted actors playing
activist roles, encouraging people to report corrupt actions through a
prominently advertised SMS short-code. Upon its release, 31,000 copies film
were then distributed in four states (Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa, Delta, and Rivers) in
the Niger-Delta region where the study was focused.
While the film’s plot focuses so
strictly on activism as a social cause, Nigeria’s Nollywood industry has grown
popular in the country and across Africa for its comedy and dramas often
dominated by glamor and aspirational stories.
The tactic to test audience behavior
was two-fold, says Graeme Blair of UCLA. “First, we distributed two versions of
the film directly to their communities, which included information on the cover
and in the film about how to send in reports. In one version of the film,
actors modeled reporting corruption, and in doing so provided an additional way
for viewers to see how to send in a report,” he says. “Second, we sent a mass
text message to everyone in each of the study communities several days after
they would have watched the film” to send corruption reports to SMS
short-codes, like the movie’s actors had done, Blair says.
The move yielded results as researchers
received texts from 1,181 unique senders “discussing corruption or the study’s
campaigns.” Of that number however, 241 unique individuals sent in “concrete
corruption reports explicitly mentioning a specific act, person, or
institution.” The researchers say those reports were then shared with local
civil society organizations.
The results notably contrasted with the
local expectations met by researchers at the start of the project: “When we
first described the campaign to experts and activists on the ground in Nigeria,
they didn’t think anyone would participate,” Rebecca Littman, one of the
researchers said in a statement. The newly released results of the study have
just been published in the journal Science
Advances.
No comments:
Post a Comment